NF1 mutations as biomarker of response to immune checkpoint blockades for lung adenocarcinoma patients.

Little is known about immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) response of NF1-mutated lung adenocarcinomas. 341/4,181 (8.2%) TCGA lung adenocarcinomas samples have a somatic NF1 mutation. NF1-mutated tumors have higher TMB (p < 0.0001), higher expression of immune genes ("hot phenotype") and higher CD8 + T cell (p = 0.03) and macrophage (p = 0.02) infiltrations compared to NF1 wild-type tumors. NF1 mutation status appears as a candidate predictive biomarker for ICI response in lung adenocarcinoma patients.

NF1 alterations in cancers: therapeutic implications in precision medicine.

INTRODUCTION: NF1 is a tumor suppressor gene encoding neurofibromin, an inhibitor of the RAS/MAPK and PI3K-AKT-mTOR signaling pathways. NF1 germline pathogenic variants cause the tumor predisposition syndrome neurofibromatosis type 1. Targeted therapies (MEK inhibitors) have been approved for benign nerve sheath tumors in neurofibromatosis type 1 patients. NF1 somatic alterations are present in ~5% of all human sporadic cancers. In melanomas, acute myeloid leukemias and lung adenocarcinomas, the NF1 somatic alteration frequency is higher (~15%). However, to date, the therapeutic impact of NF1 somatic alterations is poorly investigated. AREAS COVERED: This review presents a comprehensive overview of targeted therapies and immunotherapies currently developed and evaluated in vitro and in vivo for NF1-altered cancer treatment. A PubMed database literature review was performed to select relevant original articles. Active clinical trials were researched in ClinicalTrials.gov database in August 2022. TCGA and HGMD® databases were consulted. EXPERT OPINION: This review highlights the need to better understand the molecular mechanisms of NF1-altered tumors and the development of innovative strategies to effectively target NF1-loss in human cancers. One of the current major challenges in cancer management is the targeting of tumor suppressor genes such as NF1 gene. Currently, most studies are focusing on inhibitors of the RAS/MAPK and PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathways and immunotherapies.

De-simplifying single-tablet antiretroviral treatments for cost savings in France: From the patient perspectives to a 6-month follow-up on generics.

In developed countries, most people living with HIV/AIDS are treated with costly brand single-tablet regimens. Given the economic impact, French guidelines recommend using generic antiretroviral therapy when possible to decrease antiretroviral therapy costs. We aimed to study HIV-infected patients' acceptability to switch from a brand single-tablet regimens [abacavir/lamivudine/dolutegravir (Triumeq®) or emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/rilpivirine (Eviplera®)] to a treatment comprising of two pills: one is a fixed-dose generic combination of 2 Nucleoside Analogs and the second tablet is the third antiretroviral. This study was a prospective observational study in a French hospital. During their follow-up, patients on stable single-tablet regimens were made aware of the possible cost-saving. They were questioned about their willingness and barriers accepting the substitution. Participants chose between the two regimens, either to remain on single-tablet regimens or switch to the de-simplified regimen. Six months later, a second survey was given to the patient who chose to de-simplify and HIV viral load was controlled. The study included 98 patients: 60 receiving emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/rilpivirine (Eviplera®) and 38 on abacavir/lamivudine/dolutegravir (Triumeq®). Forty-five patients accepted the de-simplified treatment, 37 refused and 16 were undecided and followed the decision offered by their physician. The main reason for unwillingness to switch is the number of pills (77.3%). In multivariate model analysis, male patients (p = 0.001) who have taken antiretroviral therapy for over 20 years (p = 0.04) and who retrieve their treatment in their community hospital (p = 0.03) are more likely to accept the switch. Fifty-one patients accepted to replace their single-tablet regimens and six months later, the majority was satisfied; only four returned to single-tablet regimens because of suspected side effects. Half of the people living with HIV/AIDS in our cohort accepted to switch from brand single-tablet regimens to a two-tablet regimen containing generic drugs within a process that emphasizes health expenditure savings.

Development and validation of an ELISA method for the quantification of nivolumab in plasma from non-small-cell lung cancer patients.

Nivolumab, an anti PD-1 monoclonal antibody, has been approved for the treatment of previously treated advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The aim of this study was to develop and validate an ELISA method for the quantification of nivolumab in plasma from patients with NSCLC in order to perform future pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) studies. A home-made ELISA was developed and validated according to the general recommendations for the immunoassays. Then, the ELISA method was applied to quantify plasma trough levels (Cmin) of nivolumab (3mg/kg every two weeks) in 27 NSCLC patients at days 14, 28 and 42 after start of treatment. Blood samples were collected just before the infusion on days 0 (baseline), 14, 28 and 42 after start of treatment. The dynamic calibration range for nivolumab assay was 5-100µg/mL. Within- and between-day imprecision for quality controls (5, 20 and 75µg/mL) were less than 5 and 12%, respectively. The mean (±standard deviation) nivolumab Cmin was 17.3±4.8µg/mL (coefficient of variation, CV=27.8%), 25.0±9.7µg/mL (CV=38.8%) and 33.0±12.9µg/mL (CV=39.1%) on days 14, 28 and 42, respectively. IgG (p=0.002) and ALT (p=0.041) were independently associated with plasma nivolumab Cmin at day 42. The present ELISA method for quantification of nivolumab in plasma from NSCLC patients is sensitive and accurate enough to be used for further PK/PD investigations.